So, I just finished reading through everyone else's blogs (Yes. All of them. What can I say? I'm unusually unbusy tonight). Now, having had the opportunity to compare theirs to my own, I've noticed some big differences.Most of the other blogs that I've read have all been pretty structured and concise. Each post resembles a mini paper that could easily be handed in to a professor. In a lot of cases, they're direct responses to a reading we've done in class or articles from the Denver Post. They're creating smart, literary blogs.
My postings, on the other hand, tend to live up to the title of my blog - they're pretty random and all over the place. I tend to write about what I'm thinking or feeling at the time. While I do usually manage to tie it back to literature or the class in some way, I've definately been pretty unformatted.
It's just really interesting to see how using the same medium, for the same class people can create things so incredibly different. It's also very possible that I'm just doing it the wrong way (gosh, I hope not), but I think it's interesting how different people interepret the same assignment in different ways.

1 comment:
Wow--I'm impressed at your dedication to everyone else. I'm curious, did you have a chance to leave comments on their posts? I'd love (and they would, too, I'm sure) to see what their posts make you think of ...
Also, you're right--there are many ways to approach this assignment, and collectively, you're all doing some great work.
Post a Comment